[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names
From: |
Alexander Zangerl |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:49:40 +1000 |
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 23:40:03 -0400, Ken Hornstein writes:
>another question. I don't actually use MM_CHARSET myself; if it's not
>set then nmh simply falls back to using your locale setting (assuming
>you have support for the nl_langinfo() function). Why do people use
>MM_CHARSET instead of just their locale setting?
maybe because the mh-profile and scan man pages say so? :-)
regards
az
--
Alexander Zangerl + GnuPG Keys 0x42BD645D or 0x5B586291 + http://snafu.priv.at/
We're standing there pounding a dead parrot on the counter, and the mgt.
response is to frantically swap in new counters to see if that fixes the
problem. -- Peter Gutmann
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
- [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, valdis . kletnieks, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10