[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Alternate-Mailboxes: failure
From: |
rader |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Alternate-Mailboxes: failure |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:38:58 -0500 |
> > Alternate-Mailboxes: rader, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> >
> >yet msgs...
> >
> > cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> >
> >...get delivered to me in duplicate.
>
> Get _delivered_ to you in duplicate? You mean when you cc yourself? I'd
> tell you to use Fcc, but I don't want to open that can of worms again :-)
...nasty, vicious worms?
> send and friends don't use Alternate-Mailboxes; that's just for repl and
> scan.
> The man page for mh-profile explains how this works.
Ahh. I've been duped into thinking Alternate-Mailboxes works at send time
becuase Sendmail sometimes prevents me from receiving multiple copies of msgs
with multiple (unique) addresses which funnel into my inbox.
I suppose some procmail-fu is in order.
> >Wouldn't it be nice to be able to use globs?!?
>
> .... see the above paragraph :-) (They aren't technically globs, but I think
> it would suffice for your needs).
Yes, address@hidden seems quite reasonable. I think that's what I used back
when
I read the doc in 2001, 2002ish.
Apologies everyone, for not having reviewed the man page before complaining.
steve
--