[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nmh-workers] whatnow response abbreviations, "l" vs. "a"
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
[Nmh-workers] whatnow response abbreviations, "l" vs. "a" |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:26:30 -0500 |
Here's my problem: I invariably enter "l" at the whatnow prompt
when I want "list". That worked until attach was added (10 years
ago!), but I still do it.
I just realized that it doesn't have to be that way. We
currently have a similar situation with "a" that we handle
differently:
(a)ttach
(al)ist
So "a" works for attach. It's not necessary to enter "at".
Would anyone object if I changed "l" to be list? Then it
wouldn't be necessary to enter "li". So, instead of:
(li)st
(ls)
we'd have:
(l)ist
(ls)
David
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Nmh-workers] whatnow response abbreviations, "l" vs. "a",
David Levine <=