[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged.
From: |
Bill Wohler |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged. |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:28:33 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Kevin Cosgrove <address@hidden> writes:
> On 11 October 2012 at 10:35, Joel Uckelman <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Speaking for myself only: I can't recall a single time in 15 years of
>> using nmh that I've wanted to use sortm to sort less than a complete
>> folder.
>
> I have two use cases for sortm
>
> 1. sortm +folder
>
> 2. sortm -textfield subject -limit 0 +folder
Me too. I don't think I've ever used sortm with a sequence.
Glad -all became the default. Throwing an error if explicit messages
were not specified would have broken MH-E.
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> aka <address@hidden>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged.,
Bill Wohler <=