Re: [Nmh-workers] pick(1) decode RFC-2047 headers?

[rader]

+1 too.

 >>> Anything that works in terms of lines is outdated at this point.

Eek!  (Squealing like a mouse in the inside.)

steve
--

On Sat, Nov 24 2012 at 9:40am PST, P Vixie <address@hidden> wrote:
 > +1. Anything that works in terms of lines is outdated at this point.
 > 
 > Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
 > 
 > >Ralph pointed out earlier that with the proliferation of RFC
 > >2047-encoded
 > >headers, pick is much less useful.
 > >
 > >I'm wondering ... would it make sense to simply have pick run the RFC
 > >2047
 > >decoder on headers before matching them?  As far as I can tell we can
 > >decode all headers except for Received: headers.  Thoughts?
 > >
 > >--Ken
 > >
 > >_______________________________________________
 > >Nmh-workers mailing list
 > >address@hidden
 > >https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
 > 
 > -- 
 > Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
 > _______________________________________________
 > Nmh-workers mailing list
 > address@hidden
 > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers