[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:59:29 -0500 |
>Yes, but by "different purposes" I was thinking how scan
>digs back into the IO buffers. Though maybe that won't
>be necessary any more.
I had forgotten about that. Okay, looking at that now .... alright,
that's not as nasty as I thought. All it does is to use the output
stdio buffer as the input buffer for m_getfld() so we can avoid an extra
copy. Can we all agree that's not necessary anymore, and the resulting
performance gain is probably miniscule? If so, I can simply get rid of
that garbage now.
--Ken
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 2012/12/09
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 2012/12/09
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 2012/12/09
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 2012/12/09
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 2012/12/10