[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:58:42 +0000 |
Hi Ken,
> Maybe changing the error message a bit would be useful?
Yes, I agree with David's suggestion. Options include: state the RFC
bit being violated so the user can cite it at the miscreant; suggest
how the user edit the email to workaround; refer the user to a bit of
the documentation that explains the issue in more detail, including the
previous two.
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Tethys, 2012/12/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Harald Geyer, 2012/12/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Harald Geyer, 2012/12/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, David Levine, 2012/12/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, David Levine, 2012/12/18