[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T
From: |
rader |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:52:13 -0600 |
> >> Content-Type: file/pdf;
> >
> >"file" is not a registered Media Type according to IANA:
>
> Yeah, that's completely mega-bozo. According to my reading of RFC 2046,
> you're allowed to treat unknown _subtypes_ as application/octet-stream
> (well, it depends), but it is mum on what's supposed to happen if
> you get an unknown top-level type. Should we just treat this as
> application/octet-stream? I am assuming that in all other respects
> it was a correctly formatted MIME message.
Probably. I was able to view the enclosed PDF.
I have a request out for the orginal msg--to figure out the mega-bozo MUA, FYA.
steve
--
- [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T, rader, 2012/12/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T, David Levine, 2012/12/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T,
rader <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T, rader, 2012/12/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2012/12/20