[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Trailing Spaces on Default repl mhl.reply.
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Trailing Spaces on Default repl mhl.reply. |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:52:19 -0500 |
>That was the root cause of a long-standing exmh bug where GPG
>signatures on replies would be corrupted - the trailing blank got
>included in the GPG checksum generation calculation, but at the
>remote end the canonical text (minus the trailing blank) got used
>in the verification. I ended up hacking around it in exmh by
>basically doing the moral equivalent of sed 's/[ ]*$//'
Fair enough; I stand corrected. Still not going to fix mhl, though :-)
I haven't been paying much attention to encrypted email support, but I might
have to in the near term; can you point me to a reference on this?
Specifically the part about how canonical text is defined? Or is that
just a GPG thing?
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] Trailing Spaces on Default repl mhl.reply., Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Trailing Spaces on Default repl mhl.reply., Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Trailing Spaces on Default repl mhl.reply., Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Trailing Spaces on Default repl mhl.reply.,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Trailing Spaces on Default repl mhl.reply., Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Trailing Spaces on Default repl mhl.reply., Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Trailing Spaces on Default repl mhl.reply., Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/01/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Trailing Spaces on Default repl mhl.reply., Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Trailing Spaces on Default repl mhl.reply., Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/01/15