[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing
|
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing |
|
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:58:40 +0000 |
Hi Paul,
> couldn't one just skip the whole "what's a shell metacharacter these
> days?" issue, and just always go for door #3?
I suppose the overhead of kicking off sh is trying to be avoided for the
simple case. (Where the user knows route #3 is being taken then they
could do an exec but that's a bit icky.)
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/17
Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing, Paul Fox, 2013/01/17
Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing, Oliver Kiddle, 2013/01/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/18