Re: [Nmh-workers] The function, void admonish (char *what, char *fmt, ...)

[David Levine]

Ralph wrote:

> I know, that's why I showed what header was failing, in
> this case `resent-date' rather than plain old `date'.  :-)
> Or is the `date field' not hard-coded and actually showing
> the datefield was `date' in this case?

Yes:

  admonish (NULL, "can't parse %s field in message %d", datesw, msg);

where datesw contains the name of the field, either provided
with -datefield or defaulting to "date".

David