[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences)
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences) |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:44:11 +0000 |
Hi,
Ken wrote:
> folder -pack is the big one
Aside: As I think I've mentioned before, I need a `folder -pack
31415-last' to avoid much churn on incremental backups and kind of get
this by
refile @tmp "$@" </dev/null && # Assumes "yes" to "create folder".
refile -src @tmp all @. &&
rmf @. | (egrep -v '^\[\+inbox now current\]'; exit 0)
A partial-packing folder(1) that only had the given message number
ranges to play with would need less lock-time.
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Ken Hornstein, 2013/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Ken Hornstein, 2013/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Ken Hornstein, 2013/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences),
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Ken Hornstein, 2013/03/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), David Levine, 2013/03/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), David Levine, 2013/03/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), David Levine, 2013/03/10