[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 question
|
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 question |
|
Date: |
Sat, 08 Jun 2013 14:32:54 -0400 |
>Talking directly to AT&T's SMTP servers is a tad inconvenient
>now that they require SSL. But I'll try later.
I think we have SSL support in send now, don't we? Even the broke-ass
SSL required by AT&T? :-) Okay, I don't think we have -initialtls
in 1.5.
This suggests to me that it's a bug with some SMTP servers that don't
handle a blank body properly. I double-checled RFC5322; a blank body
is ok.
--Ken