[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:54:02 -0500 |
>One question: would it make sense to put the entire mhbuild
>directive in the Nmh-Attachment header instead of just the
>path? Users could then edit it as they wish.
I feel the answer is "no". I would like to give users the option to add
their own Nmh-Attachment headers; if that's just a filename, that's
reasonable. If it's a mhbuild directive, then it's not.
--Ken
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, David Levine, 2013/12/07
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, David Levine, 2013/12/11
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, David Levine, 2013/12/11
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, David Levine, 2013/12/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach,
Ken Hornstein <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, David Levine, 2013/12/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, David Levine, 2013/12/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, David Levine, 2013/12/13
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, David Levine, 2013/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, David Levine, 2013/12/15