[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] extensions on tmp filenames?
|
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] extensions on tmp filenames? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 2 Feb 2014 14:27:27 -0800 |
On Feb 2, 2014, at 6:02, David Levine <address@hidden> wrote:
> Well, that's the way it's documented. This is when an existing
> file is in the way of the new name.
Documented where? SUSv3 calls out the behaviour explicitly, as inherited from
the ISO C spec.
- [Nmh-workers] extensions on tmp filenames?, David Levine, 2014/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] extensions on tmp filenames?, David Levine, 2014/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] extensions on tmp filenames?, David Levine, 2014/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] extensions on tmp filenames?,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] extensions on tmp filenames?, David Levine, 2014/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] extensions on tmp filenames?, David Levine, 2014/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] extensions on tmp filenames?, David Levine, 2014/02/03