[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] refile's -retainsequences switch
|
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] refile's -retainsequences switch |
|
Date: |
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 19:19:53 -0400 |
>So, I guess our dialog constitutes a bug report.
Well, the person who wrote that code should speak up; looking at it
again, there's no reason it _shouldn't_ work on private sequences
that I can see (I misread the use of the is_seq_private() macro). We
might just be missing a context_save() somewhere.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] refile's -retainsequences switch, David Levine, 2014/04/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] refile's -retainsequences switch, norm, 2014/04/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] refile's -retainsequences switch, Ken Hornstein, 2014/04/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] refile's -retainsequences switch, norm, 2014/04/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] refile's -retainsequences switch, Ken Hornstein, 2014/04/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] refile's -retainsequences switch, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/04/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] refile's -retainsequences switch, Ken Hornstein, 2014/04/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] refile's -retainsequences switch, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/04/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] refile's -retainsequences switch, Ken Hornstein, 2014/04/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] refile's -retainsequences switch, Paul Fox, 2014/04/21