[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite |
Date: |
Wed, 14 May 2014 22:46:33 -0400 |
>mhlist still uses 1024-based math, but prints K/M/G. barring a
>more complete rewrite to make mhlist's output tuneable, i guess i
>should change it to either print Ki/Mi/Gi or use 1000-based math, to
>at least be self-consistent. thoughts?
If we're voting ... I'd vote to use 1000-based math with K/M/G prefixes.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/05/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/05/16