Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing

[David Levine]

Ken wrote:

> >[David:]
> >I see that, too.  I'm not as concerned with the case of using the
> >full terminal width.  I think that we're more likely to break
> >scripts that do something like this:
> >
> >    if [ `scan -format $format -width 20` = $expected_output ]
> >
> >if we add one back to width now.
> 
> We've already broken that with multibyte character handling; personally,
> I'd be fine with relaxing that requirement as well.

Does anyone object?  At this point, the fix just removes one
line of code.

David