[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:10:38 -0500 |
>> Okay, you're going to (fairly) point out this makes things harder.
>> I can't disagree with that. It's just ... we're starting to now
>> grapple with some truely hard problems, like how exactly a MIME
>> reply is supposed to work. This is something a lot of MUAs don't
>> deal with very well. I think we owe it to ourselves to try to get
>> it right.
>
>I'm not sure what "right" is here. Can we have a cleaner
>interface to accept a calendar request than what's on phones
>now? No, clicking on "accept" is as simple as it can get.
>As a user, I'd be happy to use repl or some shell alias to do
>it.
I was more thinking about preserving MH's historic flexibility. I guess
my point was I'd prefer something like this (all are aliases to 'repl')
calaccept: -typearg text/calendar accept
calreject: -typearg text/calendar reject
Rather than:
calaccept: -calendar accept
calreject: -calendar reject
Does that make sense? I don't really like the name 'typearg', I was just
trying to make the point that I'd like the options to repl be able to be
used for any MIME type.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, Ken Hornstein, 2014/11/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, David Levine, 2014/11/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, David Levine, 2014/11/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, David Levine, 2014/11/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, David Levine, 2014/11/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, David Levine, 2014/11/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, David Levine, 2014/11/12