Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.6 has been released!

[Bill Wohler]

Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> writes:

>>Not in 1.6; this change is not on the branch:
>
> I WAS sort of vague on the details; I guess I should have said, "1.6
> if you've got the right configuration, newer versions it will work
> automatically."  But I didn't want to get bogged down into the weeds here.
>
>>But I wonder if most people wouldn't prefer that you just stop
>>including these; it's funny that the last post to mh-e-users
>>before yours was a post about forcing MH-E not to download... :)
>
> The archives (at least ones that are driven by MHonArc) and I'm told
> Gmail does the right thing with those message/external-body parts.
> Although that message DID break MHonArc (but any message with RFC 2231
> parameter encoding would have done that; previous messages that didn't
> have RFC 2231 encoding were fine).
>
> What do others think?  I kind of think MH-E should be fixed!  I know those
> are out of fashion now, but I still think they're convenient.

Agreed :-).

https://sourceforge.net/p/mh-e/bugs/475/

-- 
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> aka <address@hidden>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD