[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format and components with empty content
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format and components with empty content |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 23:44:21 -0500 |
>> %(exist) (and %(notexist)) would be better for the long run.
>
>Is there really a need for these? I'm trying to think of when
>it would be useful to distinguish %(notexist) from %(null), for
>a component, but can't.
Weeeelll ... Norm claimed he had a use case (or at least implied by
his question that he did). Norm?
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] mh-format and components with empty content, norm, 2015/02/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format and components with empty content, Ken Hornstein, 2015/02/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format and components with empty content, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/02/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format and components with empty content, Ken Hornstein, 2015/02/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format and components with empty content, David Levine, 2015/02/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format and components with empty content,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format and components with empty content, norm, 2015/02/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format and components with empty content, Ken Hornstein, 2015/02/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format and components with empty content, David Levine, 2015/02/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format and components with empty content, norm, 2015/02/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format and components with empty content, David Levine, 2015/02/27