[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?
From: |
Kevin Cosgrove |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Mar 2016 16:47:22 -0800 |
On 8 March 2016 at 19:25, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
> What do people think of [Ken's] idea [to gather appropriate
> changes since the last release for a "1.7" release, followed
> by a MIME refactoring project]? If you like this idea, is
> there anything else you want fixed before a new release? I am
> thinking this would have enough to be called 1.7.
Ken, I think that's a great way to politely move forward, AND
make some headway toward sensibly keeping pace with the MIME
environment. I don't have any "must have now" items on my
list for 1.7.
Thanks for the suggestion....
--
Kevin
- [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?,
Kevin Cosgrove <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Michael Richardson, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Jerrad Pierce, 2016/03/08