[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release? |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Mar 2016 19:44:44 -0800 |
> On Mar 8, 2016, at 7:30 PM, Paul Vixie <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> message numbers are, indeed, "the problem." when i asked mark crispen why
> IMAP was so hostile to the message numbering concepts of MH, he muttered
> something about MM.
But he did buy into, and accept, the UID concept. We had that conversation in
Steveston. After a lot of good, local, beer.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Michael Richardson, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Jerrad Pierce, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Michael Richardson, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Michael Richardson, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Michael Richardson, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, norm, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/09