[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:30:12 -0400 |
>if MH could proxy its IMAP operations through a daemon running on a unix
>domain socket or the loopback interface, then we could idealize the RPC
>API between MH and that daemon. one thought is restful json.
I'm fine with that idea as well (although I see some issues in terms of
authentication, but nothing unsolveable). I'd be happy if that was
a version "1.1" or "2.0" version of some hypothetical IMAP nmh code.
I had not heard of prayer webmail, but I will check it out! But it
looks like it forks off all of the hard work on the c-client library?
And it runs a daemon out of xinetd.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, chad brown, 2016/03/17
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Conrad Hughes, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/16
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Conrad Hughes, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/16
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Conrad Hughes, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Fox, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/16