Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 2047 vs RFC 2231 encoding for MIME parameters

[Lyndon Nerenberg]

> On Oct 3, 2016, at 7:53 AM, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Again, it sticks in my craw that we have to do this, but all indications
> are that this is unfortunately rather common.

Can't we just pull off the Cyrus IMAP way of replacing all the invalid octets 
in the decoded stream with Xs? That makes a valid filename while (deliberately) 
ignoring the encoding brain damage.