[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bogus "No at-sign after local-part" error?
|
From: |
hymie! |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bogus "No at-sign after local-part" error? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2016 06:08:49 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
I don't have relevant RFCs or anything, but I suspect the problem
is that the, um, "descriptive" name looks like it is an email address,
but if it is, then it is improperly formatted.
You might need to put Booking.com (the descriptive name part) in
quotes, to emphasize that it is not to be parsed like an email addres.
--hymie!
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:23:56AM +0200, Anders Eriksson wrote:
> HI,
> While dist'ing a bunch of messages, this came up
>
> Use "/home/anders/Mail/draft"? y
> post: no at-sign after local-part (<) Booking.com <address@hidden>:
> Success, continuing...
> post: no at-sign after local-part (<) Booking.com <address@hidden>:
> Success, continuing...
> post: re-format message and try again
> send: message not delivered to anyone
>
>
> greping for Booking.com yields:
>
> Sender: Booking.com <address@hidden>
> From: Booking.com <address@hidden>
>
>
> Which for an untrained eye seems ok. At least I see a larger-than sign
> which would close the less-than.
>
> BR,
> -Anders