nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh documentation


From: David Levine
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh documentation
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:01:39 -0400

Norm wrote:

> But I wonder how much additional clarification is wise. Perhaps nmh
> documentation is reaching, or has reached, the law of diminishing returns. The
> more man pages that are added and the longer man pages become, the harder it
> will be to find something, and the less likely it would be that users will
> read the documentation. So each for each clarification, you have to balance
> how much it will help, against how much it will hurt.

Good point.  I was thinking of adding just one sentence to the post(8)
man page, referring to the postproc entry in the mh-format(5) man page,
because that seems like a reasonable place.

> I'm reminded of the original UNIX man pages, going to back version six (circa
> 1970) and seven. They were brutally terse, yet helpful.

As if the nmh man pages aren't terse? :-)

David



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]