Re: [Nmh-workers] strncpy(3), die, die, die.

[Ken Hornstein]

>> My concern there is our release cycles have been long
>
>What needs to get done before 1.7 gets sent off to make its fortune?
>Is that soon enough that this could hold off?

Um, good question.  Some things for 1.7 have not quite been resolved.

>> and I'd hate to have code that barfs on emails released for a few
>> years.
>
>Perhaps a complainant could be told of the secret $NMHNOBARF to stop
>TRUNCCPY from aborting?  Though it would still complain for the first N
>goes?

Weeelll ... I'd be okay with that.

--Ken