Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw.man

[Ralph Corderoy]

Hi,

> > I can see why the `(5)' is dropped on the second reference, so soon
> > after the first, but why does it become bold instead of italic?

For completeness, Larry replied, accidentally off list, to say that was
just a simple mistake.  And I agree with kre's comment on the `contains'
v. `is'.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy