[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions.
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions. |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Oct 2017 14:21:13 +0100 |
Hi David,
> One change that I'm not fond of: I think that "command line
> interface" should appear in the summaries. It's been that way in the
> Fedora spec since its beginning in 2005. And I think it more
> effectively conveys one of the advantages of nmh.
OK.
commit 6547ca9f73c3f02b2356017bbd7ff85292f8e4a1
SPECS: Use `command-line interface' in one-line summary.
Requested by David on nmh-workers. `shell' is still mentioned in the
description for searches.
Can Fedora actually use SPECS/nmh.spec when building, or do they always have
their own version?
I see https://packages.debian.org/jessie/nmh has another description. That and
Arch use the quaint `electronic mail' as a phrase.
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy