[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?
|
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:09:31 +0000 |
Hi Todd,
> CONFIGURE_ENV= ac_cv_header_db_h=no \
Out of interest, is that steering configure to not probe for db.h and
move on to another? Anything nmh should be doing better to avoid the
need for this and work better elsewhere?
(I would search nmh-workers archive, but the search is broken; I'll
ping them.)
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Anthony J. Bentley, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Searching the nmh-workers Archive., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., P Vix, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/03