[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?
|
From: |
Todd C. Miller |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 01 Feb 2018 11:29:46 -0700 |
On Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:09:31 +0000, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Todd,
>
> > CONFIGURE_ENV= ac_cv_header_db_h=no \
>
> Out of interest, is that steering configure to not probe for db.h and
> move on to another? Anything nmh should be doing better to avoid the
> need for this and work better elsewhere?
I think it was for an older version of nmh's configure script. As
far as I can tell, nothing in the current configure script defines
ac_cv_header_db_h.
nmh's configure selects nbdm.h and the ndbm functions from libc on
OpenBSD which is correct.
- todd
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Searching the nmh-workers Archive., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., P Vix, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?,
Todd C. Miller <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Andy Bradford, 2018/02/01
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/03