[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1? |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Feb 2018 20:03:41 -0500 |
>> CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include" LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib" ./configure
>
>Yes, now it builds and the test passes, and now I see that
>test/common.sh is actually ``built'' on demand from test/common.sh.in
>with the rest of the build process so that it defaults ICONV_ENABLED
>differently based on how it was configured. That answers my previous
>question about how ICONV_ENABLED could ever be altered (it happens at
>``build'' time).
Alright, so, question time ... do we want to fix the broken test for 1.7.1?
We've already decided, I believe, that iconv will be manitory going forward;
the only problem (AFAIK) is that the tests for when we don't have iconv are
broken.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., P Vix, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Todd C. Miller, 2018/02/01
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Andy Bradford, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?,
Ken Hornstein <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/03