[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?
|
From: |
David Levine |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 03 Feb 2018 08:21:49 -0500 |
Ralph wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> > We've already decided, I believe, that iconv will be manitory going
> > forward;
>
> Don't think David commented?
I agree with Paul F to deprecate support for absence of iconv now and
to remove it from next release.
Just to note that iconv support is included in GNU glibc. So this
change would be (or given its broad support, will be) transparent to
package maintainers on Linux platforms, at least.
David
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Todd C. Miller, 2018/02/01
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Andy Bradford, 2018/02/01
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/03