nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [nmh-workers] On the other other hand


From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: Re: [nmh-workers] On the other other hand
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 15:58:24 +0000

Hi Norman,

> You are right but:
>
> show -no ambig
> mhshow: -no ambiguous.  It matches
>   -nocheck
>   -noverbose
>   -noconcat
>   -notextonly
>   -noinlineonly
>   -noheader

Here's the `-no' things in mhshow's source.

    $ git blame uip/mhshow.c | grep 'X("no'
    de4636bb6 (Ken Hornstein  2013-01-09 22:04:23 -0500  51)     X("nocheck", 
0, NCHECKSW) \
    de4636bb6 (Ken Hornstein  2013-01-09 22:04:23 -0500  53)     X("noverbose", 
0, NVERBSW) \
    22de44b40 (Ken Hornstein  2014-03-25 22:41:13 -0400  55)     X("noconcat", 
0, NCONCATSW) \
    785ab4c97 (Ken Hornstein  2014-04-09 13:30:42 -0400  57)     
X("notextonly", 0, NTEXTONLYSW) \
    785ab4c97 (Ken Hornstein  2014-04-09 13:30:42 -0400  59)     
X("noinlineonly", 0, NINLINESW) \
    5b035a57c (Paul Fox       2015-02-08 15:22:07 -0500  63)     X("noheader", 
0, NHEADSW) \
    ceeb47c04 (Paul Fox       2017-09-02 11:24:01 -0400  69)     X("noprefer", 
0, NPREFERSW) \
    de4636bb6 (Ken Hornstein  2013-01-09 22:04:23 -0500  78)     
X("nomoreproc", -3, NPROGSW) \
    $ 

The `-3' for `nomoreproc' at the end stops it being listed when `-no' is
ambiguous.  The others match the order of `mhshow -no' output here.
That you've `-noprefer' missing tallies with it being the most recent,
2017, so again it could be down to the mhshow that's not showing it
being older than Ken's 1.7.1 release candidate.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]