[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh.
From: |
Tom Lane |
Subject: |
Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh. |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Nov 2018 19:31:19 -0500 |
Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> writes:
> I am subscribed, but occasionally I want to look at the archives. I am
> not a member of any other list that is restricted to subscribers only.
> Are you actually arguing this makes sense?
FWIW, I am on quite a few other lists that restrict their archives
to subscribers. It's not that insane a policy, though I agree it
doesn't really seem necessary for exmh-users.
If you want it changed, this is hardly the right list to be complaining
on.
regards, tom lane
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., (continued)
Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Ken Hornstein, 2018/11/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., HÃ¥kon Alstadheim, 2018/11/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Ken Hornstein, 2018/11/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh.,
Tom Lane <=
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Paul Fox, 2018/11/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Ken Hornstein, 2018/11/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/11/08
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Andy Bradford, 2018/11/08
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., valdis . kletnieks, 2018/11/08
Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Andy Bradford, 2018/11/08