oath-toolkit-help
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[OATH-Toolkit-help] Bug#807990: patch


From: Antoine Beaupré
Subject: [OATH-Toolkit-help] Bug#807990: patch
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:19:53 -0500
User-agent: Notmuch/0.18.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Control: tags -1 +patch

Here's patch that, I think, may fix that problem.

--- pam_oath/pam_oath.c.orig    2015-12-15 00:15:32.070364666 -0500
+++ pam_oath/pam_oath.c 2015-12-15 00:15:33.462364695 -0500
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
   char *usersfile;
   unsigned digits;
   unsigned window;
+  int missingok;
 };
 
 static void
@@ -86,6 +87,7 @@
   cfg->usersfile = NULL;
   cfg->digits = -1;
   cfg->window = 5;
+  cfg->missingok = 0;
 
   for (i = 0; i < argc; i++)
     {
@@ -103,6 +105,8 @@
        cfg->digits = atoi (argv[i] + 7);
       if (strncmp (argv[i], "window=", 7) == 0)
        cfg->window = atoi (argv[i] + 7);
+      if (strcmp (argv[i], "missingok") == 0)
+    cfg->missingok = 1;
     }
 
   if (cfg->digits != 6 && cfg->digits != 7 && cfg->digits != 8)
@@ -126,6 +130,7 @@
       D (("usersfile=%s", cfg->usersfile ? cfg->usersfile : "(null)"));
       D (("digits=%d", cfg->digits));
       D (("window=%d", cfg->window));
+      D (("missingok=%d", cfg->missingok));
     }
 }
 
@@ -312,7 +317,7 @@
          oath_strerror (rc), ctime (&last_otp)));
   }
 
-  if (rc != OATH_OK)
+  if (rc != OATH_OK && !(cfg->missingok && rc == OATH_UNKNOWN_USER)) 
     {
       DBG (("One-time password not authorized to login as user '%s'", user));
       retval = PAM_AUTH_ERR;
--- pam_oath/README.orig        2015-12-15 00:18:18.886368111 -0500
+++ pam_oath/README     2015-12-15 00:18:07.298367872 -0500
@@ -224,6 +224,9 @@
   "window": Specify search depth, an integer typically from 5 to 50
             but other values can be useful too.
 
+  "missingok": If specified, users missing from the "usersfile" will be
+               considered authentified.
+
 SSH Configuration
 -----------------
 
Feedback/testing welcome.

-- 
Thoughtcrime does not entail death: thoughtcrime IS death.
                        - Winston Smith, 1984



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]