[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #36439] Binary functions equivalent to infix o
|
From: |
Alexander Klein |
|
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #36439] Binary functions equivalent to infix operators not documented anywhere |
|
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2012 11:14:15 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/534.55.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.5 Safari/534.55.3 |
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #36439 (project octave):
Yes, I think it would be very useful to cross-reference this list in the
documentation of cellfun, maybe also in feval, and add a note to the section
on anonymous functions stating that there is no need to write something like
@(x,y)x+y when @plus will do as well, and especially faster, IIRC.
I'll try to write that up next week, too, and then submit an updated text
along with what I'll write for boolean indexing.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36439>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht gesendet von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/