[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #34906] Compatibility difference with ticklabe

From: Stefan Mahr
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #34906] Compatibility difference with ticklabels, linestyleorder
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:21:53 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/25.0.1364.160 Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22

Follow-up Comment #11, bug #34906 (project octave):


There's a reason why I did not use getline. It breaks this code:

set (gca (), "xticklabel", "a|");
xticklabel = get (gca (), "xticklabel");
assert (xticklabel, ["a";" "] );

> The behavior of xticklabels is getting much better, but there is
> still a problem with alignment of the labels. 
> If you look at the plot you will notice that the labels for
> 1,2,3,4 are offset to the left from their tickmark.

This problem doesn't appear with gnuplot, only with fltk.

> It seems like a possible solution would be to change to a
> null-delimited character array such that the first label was
> '1    '.

AFAIK, this would break matlab compatibility when doing
 get (gca (), "xticklabel");
IMHO, the font renderer has to trim the strings. Also, there's another problem
with fltk frontend:

set (gca (), "xticklabel", "a");

The xticklabel only appears at the first position and is not repeated.


Reply to this item at:


  Nachricht gesendet von/durch Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]