[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40470] Wrong output from normcdf (with exp?)
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40470] Wrong output from normcdf (with exp?) for negatives |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Nov 2013 01:50:35 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.101 Safari/537.36 |
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #40470 (project octave):
I don't think there's an underflow problem, I think it's simply that values
are being displayed with a fixed format when combined in a matrix with other
values.
octave:1> format
octave:2> -7, normcdf(-7)
ans = -7
ans = 1.2798e-12
octave:3> [-7, normcdf(-7)]
ans =
-7.00000 0.00000
octave:4> format long
octave:5> [-7, normcdf(-7)]
ans =
-7.000000000000000 0.000000000001280
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?40470>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40470] Wrong output from normcdf (with exp?) for negatives, anonymous, 2013/11/04
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40470] Wrong output from normcdf (with exp?) for negatives, Rik, 2013/11/04
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40470] Wrong output from normcdf (with exp?) for negatives, Marco Caliari, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40470] Wrong output from normcdf (with exp?) for negatives, Alan Genz, 2013/11/06
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40470] Wrong output from normcdf (with exp?) for negatives, Mike Miller, 2013/11/06
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40470] Wrong output from normcdf (with exp?) for negatives,
Mike Miller <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40470] display routine for variables doesn't detect need for scientific format, Rik, 2013/11/06
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40470] display routine for variables doesn't detect need for scientific format, John W. Eaton, 2013/11/07
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40470] display routine for variables doesn't detect need for scientific format, Rik, 2013/11/07