[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40560] a < b incorrect for complex numbers on MinGW

[Michael Godfrey]

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #40560 (project octave):

Rik said:
"What about compiling with either of these two options from gcc which limit
the precision of math results to IEEE standards? "

It seems to me that this is the best choice. It is only very
exceptional cases where it would make sense to go outside
the IEEE Standard.  Such cases are typically coded in Fortran
in any case.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?40560>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/