[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41112] Octave-Symbolic function naming

[anonymous]

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #41112 (project octave):

Really?

It seems to work well enough. Well for me it's better than nothing. It was
useful. Maybe it just needs some attention. Re-name those functions, add in
the missing ones (the only ones i really miss are simplify() and integrate()
--int() in matlab -- ) and it will be of some use to the community for some
time still.

I've been looking around - without much success - to see if anyone at the
school is willing to mess around in GiNaC to implement a missing function (or
two). Is GSOC any hope? -- in which case implementing more matlab
compatibility functions could be part of a bigger, more useful project?

I did come across a Git page where someone was working on a modified
octave-symbolic package to make it more matlab-like. If only....


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?41112>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/