|
From: | Michael Godfrey |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41665] 'qt' is default graphics toolkit even when it is not available |
Date: | Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:17:28 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 |
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #41665 (project octave): OK. I think I get it. The following are documented user options: --force-gui --no-gui Undocumented and therefore should not be in the code that is executed by calling octave: -cli --no-gui-libs Should the fact that --no-gui-libs is accepted by octave be reported as a bug? It is not shown for octave -h, or any call with bad options. In any case octave calls octave-gui as the binary. Right? Is it a good idea that the binary which is run in make check is not the same as the binary which is installed by make install? It would be better if make check used the same code that the user will get after make install. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?41665> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |