[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] crash with interp2
From: |
Philip Nienhuis |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] crash with interp2 |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2014 21:54:31 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22.1 |
Update of bug #41838 (project octave):
Status: None => Confirmed
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #1:
Confirmed on Windows XP (3.8.1) and Linux (Mageia-2 32b; 4.1.0+ and 3.8.0).
Tried a backtrace from 3.8.0, but got, apart from Muhali's uppercase messages,
only:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x8b93?? ()
Backtrace stopped: Not enough registers or memory available to unwind further
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?41838>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] crash with interp2, Muhali, 2014/03/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] crash with interp2,
Philip Nienhuis <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] crash with interp2, Stefan Mahr, 2014/03/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] crash with interp2, Ma Jun, 2014/03/16
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] crash with interp2, Mike Miller, 2014/03/26
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] crash with interp2, Rik, 2014/03/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] crash with interp2, Stefan Mahr, 2014/03/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] crash with interp2, Muhali, 2014/03/31
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] interp2 needs input validation for strictly monotonic property, Rik, 2014/03/31
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] interp2 needs input validation for strictly monotonic property, Muhali, 2014/03/31
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] interp2 needs input validation for strictly monotonic property, Rik, 2014/03/31
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41838] interp2 needs input validation for strictly monotonic property, Muhali, 2014/03/31