[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #43691] findpeaks: "extra" undefined if no pea
From: |
Andreas Weber |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #43691] findpeaks: "extra" undefined if no peak matches criteria |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:08:44 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/31.0 Iceweasel/31.2.0 |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43691>
Summary: findpeaks: "extra" undefined if no peak matches
criteria
Project: GNU Octave
Submitted by: andy1978
Submitted on: Di 25 Nov 2014 09:08:43 GMT
Category: Octave Forge Package
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Incorrect Result
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name:
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: dev
Operating System: GNU/Linux
_______________________________________________________
Details:
signal-1.3.0:
octave:1> data = [0; 2; 5; 6; 5; 2; 0];
octave:2> [PKS, LOC, EXTRA] = findpeaks (data, "MinPeakWidth", 3)
error: 'extra' undefined near line 253 column 19
error: called from:
error: /home/andy/octave/signal-1.3.0/findpeaks.m at line 253, column 17
this is because in findpeaks.m:225, "extra" is never populated if not even one
peak matches the MinPeakWidth, MinPeakHeight... criterias. I think extra
should returns just an empty struct in this case.
Btw, if the peaks are detected I get
warning: operator -: automatic broadcasting operation applied
warning: called from
findpeaks at line 153 column 5
from
## Treat peaks separated less than minD as one
D = abs (idx_s - idx_s');
I would suggest using bsxfun (@minus, idx_s, idx_s') if this is intended.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43691>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht gesendet von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #43691] findpeaks: "extra" undefined if no peak matches criteria,
Andreas Weber <=