[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #44672] Difference with figure/uicontrol betwe
From: |
Guillaume |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #44672] Difference with figure/uicontrol between Octave and MATLAB |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:27:11 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?44672>
Summary: Difference with figure/uicontrol between Octave and
MATLAB
Project: GNU Octave
Submitted by: gyom
Submitted on: Mon 30 Mar 2015 06:27:10 PM GMT
Category: Plotting
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Matlab Compatibility
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name: Guillaume
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: dev
Operating System: GNU/Linux
_______________________________________________________
Details:
I observed small differences in behaviour or syntax between Octave and MATLAB
regarding figure/uicontrol - they sometimes correspond to undocumented
features so I understand if they were not implemented in Octave but I thought
some of them might still be relevant. Let me know if I should write several
bug reports instead or wait for 4.0 release before doing so.
* Octave does not return all the handles of the default menu from a new
figure:
findall(figure)
i.e. Octave returns the handle of the figure only, while MATLAB returns the
handles of the figure, menu and toolbar items.
* Difference between gco and gcbo:
F = figure;
uicontrol(F,'Style','pushbutton','Callback','disp(gco),disp(gcbo)');
at each click on the button, MATLAB displays the handle of the pushbutton for
both gco and gcbo while Octave returns [] and the handle of the pushbutton,
unless you click in the figure and then gco is the handle of the figure.
* Numerical content of the 'String' property of a uicontrol:
F = figure;
uicontrol(F,'Style','Edit','String',3);
Octave returns an error as it expects a string while MATLAB will automatically
convert to a string (with a call to num2str I presume).
* Interpretation of '&' in the 'String' property of a uicontrol:
F = figure;
uicontrol(F,'Style','pushbutton','String','A&B');
In Octave, it creates an underlines B (as it would do for a uimenu, and
enables Alt-B) while on MATLAB, it displays 'A&B'.
* Options for figure/uicontrol/... can be provided as property/value pairs
and/or a structure:
figure('Color',[0.5 0.5
0.5],'Name','Title','Tag','fig_tag','Pointer','Watch')
figure('Color',[0.5 0.5
0.5],struct('Name','Title','Tag','fig_tag'),'Pointer','Watch')
MATLAB is fine with both syntaxes (I could not find it mentioned in the
documentation though) while Octave only acceps the first one.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?44672>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #44672] Difference with figure/uicontrol between Octave and MATLAB,
Guillaume <=