octave-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #44831] image package: imrotate - different di


From: H. G.
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #44831] image package: imrotate - different dimensions of output matrix
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:29:05 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:37.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/37.0

URL:
  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?44831>

                 Summary: image package: imrotate - different dimensions of
output matrix
                 Project: GNU Octave
            Submitted by: hardy
            Submitted on: Di 14 Apr 2015 11:29:04 GMT
                Category: Octave Forge Package
                Severity: 3 - Normal
                Priority: 5 - Normal
              Item Group: Matlab Compatibility
                  Status: None
             Assigned to: None
         Originator Name: 
        Originator Email: 
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
                 Release: 3.8.2
        Operating System: Any

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

Here is a simple script to show the behavior:


clear;
pkg load image;

M = [0 1 0; 0 1 0; 0 1 0];
imrot = imrotate(M, -45, 'nearest' , 'loose', 0)


The result of current Octave (3.8.2) and the imrotate function from the image
package (2.2.2 or 2.4.0) gives the following result with matrix size 4-by-4:


   0   0   0   0
   0   0   1   0
   0   1   0   0
   0   0   0   0


Matlab gives the following result, which has a different size of the output of
5-by-5:


     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     1     0
     0     0     1     0     0
     0     1     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0


Both do use the same (default) type of interpolation method (nearest) and the
same extrapolation value (0). Those two values are only explicitly given in my
example script to work around bug #44794 for image-2.2.2.

Nevertheless the resulting matrix differs in size :(




    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?44831>

_______________________________________________
  Nachricht gesendet von/durch Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]