octave-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #45369] pkg build leads to duplication of PKG_


From: Julien Bect
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #45369] pkg build leads to duplication of PKG_ADD and PKG_DEL files
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:57:03 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0

Follow-up Comment #11, bug #45369 (project octave):

One more point about PKG_ADD/PKG_DEL directives: they are not specific to
Octave Forge packages. This is a generic feature of addpath/rmpath, which is
even used in some places in Octave core:

http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/file/f5d9e57d4380/scripts/image/autumn.m#l32

http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/file/f5d9e57d4380/scripts/optimization/fminbnd.m#l61

They are also rather natural to use for autoload statements:

http://hg.code.sf.net/p/octave/image/file/b348244c0153/src/conndef.cc#l190

(Thanks Carnë for showing me all this)

So, my opinion is that we have to design a clean solution that takes into
account the existence of PKG_ADD/PKG_DEL directives (not ignore them or
propose to remove them).

I believe that comment #8, points 4--6, provide such a solution.

> What advantage do such directives have over
> what Carnë (below in pt. 2 & 3) and I suggest?
> If there's a use case for directives with
> clear advantages over Carnë's/my suggestion

I don't think Carnë ever suggested to get rid of PKG_ADD/PKG_DEL directives.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?45369>

_______________________________________________
  Message posté via/par Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]