[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #38628] bsxfun slow for complex

[John W. Eaton]

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #38628 (project octave):

The broadcast warning is gone, but it was just replaced by a different warning
tag (that change is the subject of another bug report).

Also, since @times is handled as a special case in bsxfun, why is it slow for
complex?

I was looking at bsxfun last night to see why it is slow for @bitxor, and I
got a bit lost.  It seems quite complicated.  Also bad that we now have two
ways of doing these operations.  I thought that broadcasting operators were
just syntactic sugar for bsxfun, but it seems there are actually two different
code paths for the same thing?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38628>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/