[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46493] Incorrect result from fscanf and scanf

[Doug Stewart]

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #46493 (project octave):

more info


format short g
good  = '"01","02","03","04","05","06"';
good1  = '"07"';
bad1  = '"08"';
bad2 = '"09"';
good2  = '"10"';
good3 = '"8"';
good4 = '"9"';
frm = '"%i" ,"%i","%i","%i","%i","%i"n';
v = sscanf(good,frm)'
v1 = sscanf(good1,frm)'
v2 = sscanf(bad1,frm)'
v3 = sscanf(bad2,frm)'
v4 = sscanf(good2,frm)'
v5 = sscanf(good3,frm)'
v6 = sscanf(good4,frm)'


>From this we can see that 08 and 09 are wrong but 8 and 9 are ok
and 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 are ok also


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?46493>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/